Verskil tüsken versys van "Overleg:Vöärblad"

Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
Regel 83:
:::2. In the [[Wikipedia:Praothoek#Artikelantallen_naor_dialektgroep_(4_juni_2020)|Küürhook]] you will find the rankings of the various dialects here. We keep an infrequent tally. We've seen a shift in staff over the years, resulting in an unequal amount of articles per dialect. At one point, there used to be two or even three regular writers for Twentsk, then for Grönningsk, then there was a time the Achterhook was better represented (although one contributed articles of questionable quality, which may still require some clean-up). Recently, Grwen has upped the ante for Sallandsk.
:::3. Yes, one dialect per article, except when it concerns lists or collections like [[nedersaksische humor]], where examples from every dialect are necessary to make a point. My dialect is Twentsk, although I have tried to improve the article on [[India]] in Sallandsk. Occasionally, we help each other out when we see stuff to be improved, and then notify the original author to have a look and correct where necessary. Parallel versions of some articles can be found on our NDS sister Wikipedia. The only difference often is spelling.
:::4. I'm not sure what you mean here. If your question is whether we write mostly on local issues, the answer is no. Of course, local culture is a major part of the body of articles here. You have to start somewhere, and the Dutch wikipedia doesn't address them, but we still believe that Low Saxon can be used to write on anything. So yes, you'vell find articles on Low Saxon literature such as [[Over-Ysselsche_Boere-Vryagie]] en culture such as [[Noaberschap|nåberskap]], but also on more contemporary techy stuff such as [[virtuele warkelikheid|Virtual Reality]]. If your question is whether an article on, say, the village of [[Enter]] should be written in the Entersk variety, then the answer is yes. Although the keen reader will notice in this instance I have written it in the variety of the next-door town, to hopefully spark some minor outrage and get them on board as well ;).
:::5. This needs some explaining. Low Saxon has no standard variety, and regional varieties have all figured out their own more or less commonly accepted spellings (a grand total of 20, currently in the Netherlands. You'll understand our desire for a unified spelling, which we created with the [[Nysassiske Skryvwyse]]). Since these spellings aren't taught in schools, nobody but a few hard-core writers strictly adhere to them, or even know about them. So, the original policy was to at least try to follow the regionally accepted spelling for your dialect (There's about three for my Twentsk alone). Then we developed the Algemene Nedersaksiese Skriefwieze (ANS), which was the first full-blown attempt at a unified spelling for the whole Dutch-based Low Saxon area. But that still didn't include the Low Saxon writers from the German wikipedia, who often don't like the High German-based Sass'sche Schriefwies'. So, in 2018, we set out to develop the NSS, which we more or less completed early 2020. The old policy still stands, with the addition that we'd very much appreciate it if you'd try the Nysassiske Skryvwyse. And if that's a bridge too far, the ANS.
:::6. It has already happened before, which is why there is an nds.wikipedia (Germany) and an nds-nl.wikipedia (Netherlands). The whole reason for the split was the spelling issue. There have been incubator proposals for a separate Northern Low Saxon wikipedia and a Westphalian wikipedia, but they have all been turned down. Firstly because the dialects aren't that different after all, and secondly because we're already struggling to find writers as it is. As Grwen rightly pointed out, a further split would ''spell'' the end of either wikipedia. [[Gebruker:Woolters|Woolters]] ([[Overleg gebruker:Woolters|overleg]]) 09:39, 15 sep 2020 (CEST)
Terugkeren naar de pagina "Vöärblad".