Verskil tüsken versys van "Overleg:Nysassiske Skryvwyse"
Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
Ny underwarp: →[Engels] "witt" in Wikiwoordebook |
|||
Regel 71:
How could the Low Saxon word [https://nds.wiktionary.org/wiki/witt "witt"] ("white") be written in the New Saxon Spelling? --[[Gebruker:Apisite|Apisite]] ([[Overleg gebruker:Apisite|overleg]]) 01:17, 19 sep 2020 (CEST)
:Hi there @[[User:Apisite|Apisite]]! The word 'witt' would be written as <wit>, the inflected form would be <witte>. I see that you have added ''Nysassiske Skryvwyse'' on [:nds:wikt:Vörlaag:V/layout|nds.wiktionary]. Since Nysassiske Skryvwyse is an orthography and not a dialect it doesn't quite fit into this template. We added a seperate heading under Varianten, as you can see on [[:nds.wikt:Kultuur]]. I see you've also posted a small list of words in NSS. Some texts you'll find on the internet contain typos, as not everyone is at the same level or it might be a outdated form.
*expansy = ekspansy
*provincy = provinsy
*glüklik = gelüklik
*glyk = gelyk
*kronyk = kronik
*normålityt = normaliteit
*natüür = natuur
*såk = sake
*seewyvke = seywyvke
*styvmoder = steevmoder
*vrümd = vrömd
Hope this helps! Good to see that the New Saxon Orthography has sparked your interest. [[Gebruker:Servien|Servien]] ([[Overleg gebruker:Servien|overleg]]) 23:53, 19 sep 2020 (CEST)
| |||